![]() ![]() ![]() I can share relevant code but I think this issue is likely with the TCP stack (or at least, some configuration that should be enabled?) hence it would make little difference.The Expert Infos in Wireshark are very helpful, but are they always right? You need to understand how TCP behaves to know if you can trust what Wireshark tells you. The connection to the Linux box is through a switch, however while directly connecting to it point-point, there is marginal reduction in the delay. But reducing the response is not a valid solution in our use case. Also, when reducing the response size by half (8KB), the retransmissions are rare and hence the delay is minute as well. I have tried disabling the Nagle algorithm on the server to possibly improve performance but it did not have any effect. Reduce the 300ms delay from the client side to quickly retransmit the obstructed read request.Reduce the frequency of retransmissions.I want to figure out what is causing these retransmissions (hence delays) and what can possibly be done to. ![]() This delay adds up and causes some 5-6 seconds of delay for a complete cycle of 40 requests to complete.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |